Did someone else die in
Jesus’ place?
A
reply to the theory of substitution
My Muslim friends often tell me, “Jesus was taken up to heaven by
Allah, before they could kill him. He was not crucified. A person who looked
like Him (Shabih) was put in His place by Allah, and the people thought it was
Jesus. Glory be to God, the all-powerful,
all-wise.”
Think about it!
·
I am truly mystified: How would a fake crucifixion bring any glory to
God, especially if nobody knew about it until 600 years later at the time of
Muhammad?
·
If God really wanted to rescue His prophet, why didn’t He just
lift him up to heaven in full view of everyone? It would have been even more
wonderful for people to see with their own eyes what God was doing, and see
God’s “vindication”! Why did He have to do it secretly? Why
did He have to give someone else (innocent!) to the Jews to crucify? It makes no
sense.
·
God would not deceive people by making them think that it was Jesus whom
they were crucifying, when in fact it was someone else. God doesn’t lie!
·
Would God allow the foundation of the Christian faith to be based on a
deception and misidentification that He Himself had orchestrated? If so, it
would make God the biggest hoaxer in human history. This cannot be; He is a
just and holy God who always does what is right.
Now, I know that you, my Muslim friend, think that it would be a defeat if a
prophet were killed at the hand of his enemies. For this reason, I’d like
to ask you three questions:
First, which of the following would be a greater act by God? Which one
of these would best show God’s mighty power?
1. To deceive people and
snatch Jesus up without letting Him die.
-or-
2. To let Jesus die and then raise Him
from the dead.
Raising someone from the dead is surely the greater act. So whereas Muslims say
that Allah is so great that he wouldn’t have allowed his prophet to die,
Christians say, “Well, our God showed even greater power by raising Jesus
from the dead.”
Secondly, which is the greater victory?
1. To escape death by allowing
someone else to die in your place,
- or -
2. To defeat death, by dying for others
and rising from the dead?
Surely the second option.
Here is my third question. Which of the following would best honour Jesus and bring most glory to God?
1. For Jesus to use violence
to attack the people that were arresting him.
2. For Jesus to escape.
– or
–
3. For Jesus, out of love for His enemies,
to take the worst that they could inflict on Him (death on the cross), and then
for Him to publicly conquer death by rising from the grave.
Obviously the third action would bring the most glory to God, and that is
exactly what the Bible says that Jesus did.
The eyewitnesses
Let us return to the scene of the cross and question the eyewitnesses:
1. Could not the crucified
substitute have complained loudly and vigorously during his public ordeal that
he was not Jesus?
2. What kind of God
would allow Mary (Jesus’ mother) and the beloved friends of Jesus to
suffer as they watched the agony of one whom they thought to be Jesus? Would
God allow His followers to go through this tortuous experience because of an
illusion that He Himself had orchestrated?
3. The centurion in
charge of Jesus’ crucifixion later confessed faith in Him because Jesus
exhibited such holiness. A sinful traitor like Judas would never have left such
an impression.
4. The gospel accounts
(Injil) record seven statements that Jesus made while on the cross. No one else
could have said such remarkable words. For example, how could anyone other than
Jesus pray (while He was going through excruciating pain) that God would
forgive His persecutors? How could such merciful and compassionate sentiments
come from the lips of Judas, the traitor?
5. The criminal executed
alongside Jesus would not have called on Him for salvation, nor would he have
received salvation, if Jesus was just another sinner there on the cross beside
him.
6. There is also another
important issue that Muslim commentators have failed to resolve: the case of
Jesus’ body. Muslims claim that the substitute (Shabih) resembled Jesus
in His face only. His body was not subject to any change. They say, "The
face is the face of Jesus, but the body is not His body."[1]
If this statement is true, how then did Mary fail to recognize the
difference between the body of her son and the body of the crucified
substitute? What about Joseph of Arimathea and
Nicodemus, a member of the Sanhedrin and a secret believer in Jesus? In the
context of the crucifixion story it is stated that they were able to obtain
official permission from the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, to lay Jesus in a
tomb that Joseph had prepared for himself. If the crucified one was not Jesus,
how did these two men fail to distinguish between Jesus’ body and the
body of an impostor? Did Judas have, for instance, the same height, weight and
skin colour of Jesus? Did he have the same hair and
other visible characteristics of his holy Master?
Furthermore, we learn that on the day of Jesus’ resurrection, in
the evening, He appeared to His disciples and showed them His hands, where they
could see the marks of the nails, and His side, where He’d been pierced
by the spear of the Roman soldier (Bible, Injil, John 20: 19-20). Thus He
proved to them that He was the One who was crucified and that no-one had taken
his place. These are tangible evidences that are hard for any objective
researcher to overlook.
Besides, what would you think of God if for hundreds of years He had
promised that the Messiah would come to die for the sins of the world, and
then, at the last moment, when Jesus was about to be put on the cross, He took
Him alive and changed someone else to look like him? Does this description fit
God? Not only would this have made God out to be a liar, but there would have
been no salvation from sin!
Why was Jesus’ death
necessary anyway?
Because death is our problem! When God made Adam, He appointed him to
represent us in the Garden of Eden (جنة عدن). The
Hebrew name “Adam” means mankind. My relationship with God depends
on my representative’s relationship with God.
God commanded Adam, “Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; but
of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day
that you eat of it you shall surely die.” (Bible, Torah, Genesis 2:16-17)
God’s warning was clear: disobedience leads to death.
Adam and Eve ignored God’s warning and deliberately disobeyed Him.
The consequence? Death –
spiritual and physical, as God had warned. “The wages of sin is
death,” as the Bible expresses it. Their expulsion from the Garden of
Eden illustrates the reality of their personal relationship with God being
broken because of their sin. It is because Adam died spiritually that he died
physically several hundred years later. Adam and Eve would not have died if
they had not disobeyed God.
And so when the representative, Adam, disobeyed, all mankind disobeyed!
Sin (like poison) entered into our world and into human life. When God punished
Adam by causing him to die, we were all likewise punished – we all die
too.
So death is man’s big problem. If anyone were to save us, he would
have to solve this problem. He would have to conquer death. He would have to
restore our broken relationship with God. This is something you and I could
never have done for ourselves or for others. God in His kindness says that the
way we are to be saved is for Christ to take death, spiritual and physical,
upon Himself in our place. What is the evidence that Jesus defeated death? The
evidence is His resurrection from the dead. “O death, where is your
sting?” (Bible, Injil, 1Corinthians 15:55)
Here is how the Bible (Injil) summarizes the parallel between Adam and Christ:
“Since by man [Adam] came death, by Man [Christ] also came the
resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall
be made alive.” (Bible, Injil, 1Corinthians 15: 21, 22)
“Christ also suffered once for sins, the just
for the unjust,
that He might bring us to God.”
(Injil, 1Peter 3:18)
How shall we escape if we ignore such a great salvation?
[1] Fakhradin Al-Razi: Al-Tafsir Al-Kabir p.102; vol. 11;
Dar al Fikr, Beirut, Lebanon, 1981. Also refer to the
Commentaries of the Jalalayn and the Baydawi concerning the interpretation of verse 157 of Surah
4.